[wwwdocs] RFC - mention Cilk Plus in the GCC 4.9 release notes

Tobias Burnus burnus@net-b.de
Sat Mar 8 19:58:00 GMT 2014


Iyer, Balaji V wrote:
> Thank you for catching this. Yes, it should be ABI 1.1
...
> The sentence "Current only..." should be changed to something like 
> this: Currently all the features except _Cilk_for has been implemented.

How about the following patch to changes.html - and to doc/invoke.texi?

Regarding _Cilk_for, I assume that the missing bits are in 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-02/msg01283.html ? It is a bit 
unfortunate that 4.9 will miss that bits :-/

Tobias
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cilk.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20140308/f76ae3c1/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: cilk2.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1043 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20140308/f76ae3c1/attachment-0001.bin>


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list