[patch i386]: Combine memory and indirect jump
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Mon Jun 23 14:13:00 GMT 2014
On 06/20/2014 02:59 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> So I suggest following change of passes.def:
>
> Index: passes.def
> ===================================================================
> --- passes.def (Revision 211850)
> +++ passes.def (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -384,7 +384,6 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> NEXT_PASS (pass_rtl_dse2);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_stack_adjustments);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_jump2);
> - NEXT_PASS (pass_peephole2);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_if_after_reload);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_regrename);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_cprop_hardreg);
> @@ -391,6 +390,7 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> NEXT_PASS (pass_fast_rtl_dce);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_duplicate_computed_gotos);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_reorder_blocks);
> + NEXT_PASS (pass_peephole2);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_branch_target_load_optimize2);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_leaf_regs);
> NEXT_PASS (pass_split_before_sched2);
Looks good to me. I guess just keep an eye out for bug reports for other ports.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list