[patch i386]: Combine memory and indirect jump

[Jeff Law]

On 06/17/14 14:35, Kai Tietz wrote:
> I just did retest my testcase with recent source. I can't reproduce
> this missed optimization before sched2 pass anymore.  I moved second
> peephole2 pass just before split_before_sched2 and everything got
> caught.
Let's go with this if your idea of using a define_split doesn't work out.



>
> To remove first peephole2 pass seems to cause weaker code for
> impossible pushes, etc
OK.


>
> Nevertheless it might be a point to make this new peephole instead a
> define_split?  I admit that this operation isn't a split, nevertheless
> we would avoid a second peephole pass.
Doesn't hurt to try and as you say, if we can avoid a 2nd peep2 pass, 
that's good.

jeff