[Patch ARM/testsuite 00/22] Neon intrinsics executable tests

[Christophe Lyon]

On 12 June 2014 04:31, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Jun 10, 2014, at 3:03 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.gcc@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> I am a bit ambivalent between getting folks to add scan-assembler
>> tests here and worrying between this and getting the behaviour
>> correct. Additionally if you add the complexity of scanning for
>> aarch64 as well this starts getting messy.
>>
>> At this point I'm going to wait to see if any of the testsuite
>> maintainers step in and comment and if not I'll start looking at this
>> properly early next week.
>
> [ ducks ] So, I wasn’t going to comment…  If you guys do something really stupid, I’ll scream, as hopefully will others.  Doing something a little misguided I don’t think hurts much.  The worst case if you figure out in a year or two why it was a bad idea and then fix it, not the end of the world.

If the execution part is OK and the scan-assembler is questionable, I
can just remove that part (or leave it commented until we decide
otherwise).