[GSoC] generation of Gimple code from isl_ast_node_if

[Roman Gareev]

> I would still add a test case which does not contain a reduction (+=)
> and where graphite is not duplicating pbbs.

> Help for what? I was looking to create a simple test case. Is there still an
> open bug?

Sorry, I thought, we should add this test case to be able to test
graphite without patch related to graphite-sese-to-poly.c (patch1).

> Sorry Roman. I am still confused. Are we looking for a test case or are we
> still trying to understand an issue. Specifically, do we still incorrectly
> transform the code even after your isl_id_for_pbb() patch?

I gives a wrong answer without patch1. The code is transformed
correctly with this patch.

--
                                   Cheers, Roman Gareev.