Regimplification enhancements 3/3

[Bernd Schmidt]

On 07/24/2014 02:38 PM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> This seems to be the statement which has its RHS converted to to a
> MEM_REF[&_6], am I right?  I wonder whether it is correct input
> though, because it looks like it has mismatched types.  The LHS is
> clearly an aggregate of type struct S while the RHS is an SSA name,
> meaning it cannot be of an aggregate type.  Does this pass gimple
> checking?  What creates that statement?

The code in gimplify-me which I was proposing to remove. I guess I'll 
just commit that patch.


Bernd