[C++ Patch] PR 58980
Wed Jan 22 17:14:00 GMT 2014
On 01/21/2014 09:55 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I think I would prefer to change the "child" assert to be
> MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P rather than CLASS_TYPE_P.
On second thought, no, I think we do want to specifically handle
TYPENAME_TYPE. But I think we want a different error message; getting a
TYPENAME_TYPE here means that B has not been declared. The current
scope is irrelevant. So we want to check for TYPENAME_TYPE before we
think about checking prev_scope.
More information about the Gcc-patches