[C++ Patch] PR 58980

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Wed Jan 22 17:14:00 GMT 2014


On 01/21/2014 09:55 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> I think I would prefer to change the "child" assert to be
> MAYBE_CLASS_TYPE_P rather than CLASS_TYPE_P.

On second thought, no, I think we do want to specifically handle 
TYPENAME_TYPE.  But I think we want a different error message; getting a 
TYPENAME_TYPE here means that B has not been declared.  The current 
scope is irrelevant.  So we want to check for TYPENAME_TYPE before we 
think about checking prev_scope.

Jason



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list