[PATCH] Fix up expand_small_movmem_or_setmem (PR target/59003)
Tue Jan 21 19:15:00 GMT 2014
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 08:08:19PM +0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Yes, this is OK.
Thanks. BTW, I wonder if we got small expected_size_exp like in this
case (6), if it is desirable to emit the large >= 32 size handling
inline, if (say unless -minline-all-stringops) we couldn't just emit for
that a library call. Of course only if expected_size_exp is sufficiently
smaller than 32 that the larger sizes wouldn't occur too frequently (at
least according to profile info).
More information about the Gcc-patches