[Patch] Fix regex `nosubs` correctly
Jonathan Wakely
jwakely@redhat.com
Tue Jan 21 10:09:00 GMT 2014
On 20/01/14 17:43 -0500, Tim Shen wrote:
>The semantic of `nosubs` should simply be that `let all parentheses
>not be a subexpression and do not capture it`.
It's not clear to me whether the standard says that nosubs implies
mark_count() == 0 or that the mark count remains the same, but no
sub-expression matches are stored in the results.
What does Boost.Regex do?
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list