[C++ Patch] PR 59270

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Wed Jan 15 19:45:00 GMT 2014

On 01/15/2014 07:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> It seems Ok to me, and passes testing, to
> return NULL_TREE from build_value_init. Alternately, more
> conservatively, we could change build_value_init_noctor to not call
> build_value_init at all when ftype == error_mark_node.

I think I would prefer that.  I'm uncomfortable with returning NULL_TREE.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list