Drop REG_CROSSING_JUMP when converting to a conditional return

Jeff Law law@redhat.com
Tue Jan 14 14:32:00 GMT 2014

On 01/14/14 03:37, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> While experimenting with a patch to use conditional returns, I hit a case
> where a conditional jump between hot and cold sections was being converted
> into a conditional return.  The new jump still had the REG_CROSSING_JUMP
> and later passes were confused by the combination of that and a return
> The jump is now returning directly from the current section rather than
> crossing sections within the function, so I think we should just drop
> the note.
> Tested on s390x-linux-gnu with some local patches.  OK to install?
> Thanks,
> Richard
> gcc/
> 	* jump.c (redirect_jump_2): Remove REG_CROSSING_JUMP notes when
> 	converting a conditional jump into a conditional return.


More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list