[C++ patch] for C++/52369

[Fabien Chêne]

2014-02-28 22:52 GMT+01:00 Fabien Chêne <fabien.chene@gmail.com>:
>>> Incidentally, while moving the diagnostic concerning the uninitialized
>>> field from an error to an inform, I realized that the syntactic sugar
>>> %q#D is no longer honored an is treated as %qD, is it expected ?
>>
>>
>> No, how do you mean?
>
> I must be tired, false alarm, sorry.

I guess my mistake comes from the fact that %q#D is not present in the
c++98 diagnostic. Shall we homogeneise that as well ?
In favor of %q#D ?

-- 
Fabien