[PATCH, PR63995, CHKP] Use single static bounds var for varpool nodes sharing asm name

Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu@gmail.com
Mon Dec 8 11:00:00 GMT 2014


Ping

2014-11-26 15:35 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com>:
> On 25 Nov 15:03, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> 2014-11-25 14:11 GMT+03:00 Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>:
>> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Ilya Enkovich <enkovich.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok, then it's get_for_asmname ().  That said - the above loops look
>> > bogus to me.  Honza - any better ideas?
>>
>> get_for_asmname ()  returns the first element in a chain of nodes with
>> the same asm name.  May I rely on the order of nodes in this chain?
>> Probably use ASSEMBLER_NAME as a key in chkp_static_var_bounds hash?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ilya
>>
>> >
>> > Richard.
>> >
>
> A variant with var's ASSEMBLER_NAME as a key works fine.  Instrumented bootstrap passes.  OK for trunk?
>
> Thanks,
> Ilya
> --
> gcc/
>
> 2014-11-26  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>
>         PR bootstrap/63995
>         * tree-chkp.c (chkp_make_static_bounds): Share bounds var
>         between nodes sharing assembler name.
>
> gcc/testsuite
>
> 2014-11-26  Ilya Enkovich  <ilya.enkovich@intel.com>
>
>         PR bootstrap/63995
>         * g++.dg/dg.exp: Add mpx-dg.exp.
>         * g++.dg/pr63995-1.C: New.
>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp
> index 14beae1..44eab0c 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/dg.exp
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>
>  # Load support procs.
>  load_lib g++-dg.exp
> +load_lib mpx-dg.exp
>
>  # If a testcase doesn't have special options, use these.
>  global DEFAULT_CXXFLAGS
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr63995-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr63995-1.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..82e7606
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr63995-1.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target mpx } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -g -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx" } */
> +
> +int test1 (int i)
> +{
> +  extern const int arr[10];
> +  return arr[i];
> +}
> +
> +extern const int arr[10];
> +
> +int test2 (int i)
> +{
> +  return arr[i];
> +}
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-chkp.c b/gcc/tree-chkp.c
> index 3e38691..924cb71 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-chkp.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-chkp.c
> @@ -2727,9 +2727,23 @@ chkp_make_static_bounds (tree obj)
>    /* First check if we already have required var.  */
>    if (chkp_static_var_bounds)
>      {
> -      slot = chkp_static_var_bounds->get (obj);
> -      if (slot)
> -       return *slot;
> +      /* For vars we use assembler name as a key in
> +        chkp_static_var_bounds map.  It allows to
> +        avoid duplicating bound vars for decls
> +        sharing assembler name.  */
> +      if (TREE_CODE (obj) == VAR_DECL)
> +       {
> +         tree name = DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (obj);
> +         slot = chkp_static_var_bounds->get (name);
> +         if (slot)
> +           return *slot;
> +       }
> +      else
> +       {
> +         slot = chkp_static_var_bounds->get (obj);
> +         if (slot)
> +           return *slot;
> +       }
>      }
>
>    /* Build decl for bounds var.  */
> @@ -2793,7 +2807,13 @@ chkp_make_static_bounds (tree obj)
>    if (!chkp_static_var_bounds)
>      chkp_static_var_bounds = new hash_map<tree, tree>;
>
> -  chkp_static_var_bounds->put (obj, bnd_var);
> +  if (TREE_CODE (obj) == VAR_DECL)
> +    {
> +      tree name = DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (obj);
> +      chkp_static_var_bounds->put (name, bnd_var);
> +    }
> +  else
> +    chkp_static_var_bounds->put (obj, bnd_var);
>
>    return bnd_var;
>  }



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list