[PATCH, ARM] PR62248 - Configure error with --with-fpu=fp-armv8

Richard Earnshaw rearnsha@arm.com
Wed Aug 27 12:26:00 GMT 2014


On 27/08/14 12:35, Yvan Roux wrote:
> with the PR in the ChangeLog:
> 
> 2014-08-27  Yvan Roux  <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
> 
>         PR other/62248
>         * config.gcc (arm*-*-*): Check --with-fpu against arm-fpus.def.
> 
> 

OK, thanks.

R.

> On 27 August 2014 13:10, Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Here is the patch that uses the arm-fpus.def list.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Yvan
>>
>> 2014-08-27  Yvan Roux  <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
>>
>>         * config.gcc (arm*-*-*): Check --with-fpu against arm-fpus.def.
>>
>> On 27 August 2014 12:35, Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> On 27 August 2014 11:24, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> On 27/08/14 09:04, Yvan Roux wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> as reported in PR62248 there is a typo in gcc/config.gcc where
>>>>> --with-fpu doesn't match -mfpu option for fp-armv8 value (fp-arm-v8 in
>>>>> config.gcc). Here is the patch to fix it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Yvan
>>>>>
>>>>> 2014-08-27  Yvan Roux  <yvan.roux@linaro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>         * config.gcc:  Fix fp-armv8 option for arm*-*-* targets.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> pr62248.diff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
>>>>> index 6862c127..3f68e3e 100644
>>>>> --- a/gcc/config.gcc
>>>>> +++ b/gcc/config.gcc
>>>>> @@ -3528,7 +3528,7 @@ case "${target}" in
>>>>>               | vfp | vfp3 | vfpv3 \
>>>>>               | vfpv3-fp16 | vfpv3-d16 | vfpv3-d16-fp16 | vfpv3xd \
>>>>>               | vfpv3xd-fp16 | neon | neon-fp16 | vfpv4 | vfpv4-d16 \
>>>>> -             | fpv4-sp-d16 | neon-vfpv4 | fp-arm-v8 | neon-fp-armv8 \
>>>>> +             | fpv4-sp-d16 | neon-vfpv4 | fp-armv8 | neon-fp-armv8 \
>>>>>                  | crypto-neon-fp-armv8)
>>>>>                       # OK
>>>>>                       ;;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ok; but better still would be to change this to use the official list in
>>>> arm-fpus.def (like we do for CPU names).
>>>
>>> Yes indeed, I'll do it that way.
> 




More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list