[PATCH c++/57709] Wshadow is too strict / has false positives

Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com
Thu Aug 21 21:35:00 GMT 2014

Previous message (by thread): [PATCH c++/57709] Wshadow is too strict / has false positives
Next message (by thread): [PATCH c++/57709] Wshadow is too strict / has false positives
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 08/21/2014 04:22 PM, Manuel LÃ³pez-IbÃ¡Ã±ez wrote:
> +			&& TREE_CODE (x) != FUNCTION_DECL
> +			&& !FUNCTION_POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (x))))

How about pointer to member function?

Jason

Previous message (by thread): [PATCH c++/57709] Wshadow is too strict / has false positives
Next message (by thread): [PATCH c++/57709] Wshadow is too strict / has false positives
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list