Patch ping
DJ Delorie
dj@redhat.com
Wed Apr 9 22:29:00 GMT 2014
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01370.html
> PR sanitizer/56781
> fix --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap of lto-plugin
I have no particular problem with this patch, although the build has
gotten beyond my full understanding these days...
However, does this fix a regression? If not, it should wait for
stage1.
> - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01433.html
> PR sanitizer/56781
> fix --with-build-config=bootstrap-asan bootstrap of lto-plugin
Are we really going to multilib libiberty for every "useful" option we
think of? For the build/host, we have a generic way of providing
CFLAGS, and for the target we already have a multilib structure.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list