[PATCH][C++] Fix PR60761, diagnostics in clones

[Richard Biener]

On April 8, 2014 8:03:08 PM CEST, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>On 04/08/2014 07:58 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> Jason, is <clone> good or shall I use sth else (do we annotate
>in-charge vs. not in-charge
>> constructors specially for example?).
>
>The names of the in-charge and not-in-charge constructor clones are 
>complete_ctor_identifier and base_ctor_identifier (and dtor for 
>destructors); you could check for those.

I was more asking for how we present those To the user in diagnostics. I wanted to use a consistent 'quoting' style. If using <clone> is fine then I'll just stick to that.

OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Richard.

>Jason