Fix various x86 tests for --with-arch=bdver3 --with-cpu=bdver3

[Uros Bizjak]

On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> When I fixed various tests in
> <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01662.html> for failures
> with --with-arch=bdver3, I missed that a so-configured compiler still
> defaults to -mtune=generic.  If you override that as well with
> --with-cpu=bdver3, further failures appear, and this patch fixes some
> of them.
>
> Most of these changes add -mno-prefer-avx128 to AVX tests not
> expecting a -mprefer-avx128 default.  In addition, some tests have
> -mtune=generic added where the behavior tested for depends on some
> tuning parameter that I identified: X86_TUNE_EXT_80387_CONSTANTS or
> X86_TUNE_SSE_LOAD0_BY_PXOR.
>
> Tested x86_64-linux-gnu.  OK to commit?
>
> There are other failures this patch does not resolve in a
> --with-arch=bdver3 --with-cpu=bdver3 configuration.  Some of these are
> AVX tests whose failures are not resolved by adding -mno-prefer-avx128
> (and so this patch does not add -mno-prefer-avx128 to those tests);
> others may be cases where -mtune=generic is appropriate but I haven't
> identified the specific tuning parameter that shows code generation
> differences depending on tuning are correct and so a -mtune= option
> should be used.
>
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpand-1.c scan-assembler vpand[ \\t]+[^\n]*%ymm[0-9]
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpand-3.c scan-assembler-times vpand[ \\t]+[^\n]*%ymm[0-9] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpandn-1.c scan-assembler vpandn[ \\t]+[^\n]*%ymm[0-9]
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpor-1.c scan-assembler vpor[ \\t]+[^\n]*%ymm[0-9]
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpxor-1.c scan-assembler vpxor[ \\t]+[^\n]*%ymm[0-9]
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-load-2.c scan-assembler (sse2_loaddqu|vmovdqu[^\n\r]*movv16qi_internal)
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-load-2.c scan-assembler vinsert.128
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vec-init.c scan-assembler-times vmovdqa64[ \\t]+%zmm 2
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vmovdqu32-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovdqu[36][24][ \\t]+[^\n]*\\)[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vmovupd-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovupd[ \\t]+[^\n]*\\)[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandd-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandd[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 4
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandd-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandd[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandd-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandd[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandnd-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandnd[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 4
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandnd-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandnd[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandnd-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandnd[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandnq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandnq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandnq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandnq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandnq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandnq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpandq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpandq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpord-1.c scan-assembler-times vpord[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 4
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpord-1.c scan-assembler-times vpord[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpord-1.c scan-assembler-times vpord[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vporq-1.c scan-assembler-times vporq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vporq-1.c scan-assembler-times vporq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vporq-1.c scan-assembler-times vporq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpxord-1.c scan-assembler-times vpxord[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 4
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpxord-1.c scan-assembler-times vpxord[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpxord-1.c scan-assembler-times vpxord[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpxorq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpxorq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9][^{] 3
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpxorq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpxorq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}[^{] 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-vpxorq-1.c scan-assembler-times vpxorq[ \\t]+[^\n]*%zmm[0-9]{%k[1-7]}{z} 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr49002-1.c scan-assembler vmovapd[\t ]*[^,]*,[\t ]*%xmm
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr53712.c scan-assembler-times movdqu 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr53907.c scan-assembler movdqa
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr59539-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovdqu 1
> FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr59539-2.c scan-assembler-times vmovdqu 1
>
> 2014-04-01  Joseph Myers  <joseph@codesourcery.com>
>
>         * gcc.target/i386/387-3.c, gcc.target/i386/387-4.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/pr30970.c: Use -mtune=generic.
>         * gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpaddb-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpaddd-3.c, gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpaddq-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpaddw-3.c, gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmulld-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpmullw-3.c, gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsrad-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsraw-3.c, gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsrld-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsrlw-3.c, gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsubb-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsubd-3.c, gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsubq-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpsubw-3.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-load-1.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-load-4.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-store-1.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-store-2.c,
>         gcc.target/i386/avx256-unaligned-store-4.c: Use
>         -mno-prefer-avx128.

OK.

Thanks,
Uros.