[v3] More noexcept -- 5th

Marc Glisse marc.glisse@inria.fr
Fri Sep 20 14:26:00 GMT 2013


On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Paolo Carlini wrote:

> On 09/20/2013 09:46 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> for basic_string, I tried not to add lies about exceptions, but I didn't
>> remove existing ones.
> Of course we should not have lies, I thought we didn't, besides maybe special 
> cases having to do with the FULLY_DYNAMIC string thing, really a C++98 legacy 
> wa, which will not exist in the future. Can you please send an updated patch 
> fixing those?

Would you mind if we did that as a separate follow-up patch, unless there 
are other problems with the patch? One is adding noexcept for 
optimization, the other one would be removing some (no intersection) for 
correctness. I'll do it this WE. I'll also need to remove the 
corresponding noexcept from debug/profile mode...

-- 
Marc Glisse



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list