[v3] More noexcept -- 5th
Marc Glisse
marc.glisse@inria.fr
Fri Sep 20 14:26:00 GMT 2013
On Fri, 20 Sep 2013, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> On 09/20/2013 09:46 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> for basic_string, I tried not to add lies about exceptions, but I didn't
>> remove existing ones.
> Of course we should not have lies, I thought we didn't, besides maybe special
> cases having to do with the FULLY_DYNAMIC string thing, really a C++98 legacy
> wa, which will not exist in the future. Can you please send an updated patch
> fixing those?
Would you mind if we did that as a separate follow-up patch, unless there
are other problems with the patch? One is adding noexcept for
optimization, the other one would be removing some (no intersection) for
correctness. I'll do it this WE. I'll also need to remove the
corresponding noexcept from debug/profile mode...
--
Marc Glisse
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list