[patch] Fix another fallout of partial inlining change

[Eric Botcazou]

> Sorry, I missed your mail and it seems that my original mail did not
> hit the mailing list.  I am attaching what I wrote back then for a record.
> The patch fixes situation where function is externaly visible and called
> once.  In this case it makes sense to partially inline it into the
> one caller.  Previous heuristic was wrong assuming that the function is
> static and thus preventing splitting because it makes more sense to inline
> it always.

OK, thanks for the explanation.

> Thinking about it, we ought to prvent splitting always_inline functions:
> those may contain something that relies on inlining.  Either you can
> include in your change or I will fix it as a followup.

I'll let you make the change.

-- 
Eric Botcazou