[wide-int] int_traits <tree>

[Richard Biener]

On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:

> On 10/17/2013 07:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > Oh, so it was the tree rep that changed?  _Why_ was it changed?
> > We still cannot use it directly from wide-int and the extra
> > word is redundant because we have access to TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE ()).
> >   
> It was changed because you asked me to change it.   However, you end up with
> special cases either way.

It was a mis-communication - I thought you added this to the wide-int
rep to be able to use both tree and RTX reps directly.

Richard.