[PATCH,ARM] fix testsuite failures for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf

Charles Baylis charles.baylis@linaro.org
Wed Oct 16 10:55:00 GMT 2013


PIng?

On 19 September 2013 18:21, Charles Baylis <charles.baylis@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Here is an updated version.
>
> Changelog:
>
>         * gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c: skip test on arm hardfloat ABI targets
>         * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Remove options, forcing -mthumb fails
> with hardfloat, and test is not thumb-specific
>         * gcc,target/arm/thumb-ltu.c: Avoid test failure with
> hardfloat ABI by requiring arm_thumb1_ok
>         * lib/target-supports.exp
> (check_effective_target_arm_fp16_ok_nocache): don't force
> -mfloat-abi=soft when building for hardfloat target
>
> On 19 August 2013 16:34, Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 15/08/13 15:10, Charles Baylis wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> The attached patch fixes some tests which fail when testing gcc for a
>>> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf target because they do not expect to be built
>>> with a hard float ABI.
>>>
>>> The change in target-supports.exp fixes arm-fp16-ops-5.c and arm-fp16-ops-6.c.
>>>
>>> Tested on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf using qemu-arm, and does not cause
>>> any other tests to break.
>>>
>>> Comments? This is my first patch, so please point out anything wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013-08-15  Charles Baylis  <charles.baylis@linaro.org>
>>>
>>>         * gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c: skip test on arm hardfloat ABI targets
>>>         * gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c: Use -mfloat-abi=soft as Thumb1 does
>>> not support hardfloat ABI
>>>         * arm/thumb-ltu.c: Use -mfloat-abi=soft as Thumb1 does not
>>> support hardfloat ABI
>>>         * target-supports.exp: don't force -mfloat-abi=soft when
>>> building for hardfloat target
>>>
>>>
>>> hf-fixes.txt
>>>
>>>
>>> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c     (revision 201726)
>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c     (working copy)
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>>  /* { dg-do run } */
>>>  /* { dg-skip-if "Variadic funcs have all args on stack. Normal funcs have args in registers." { "aarch64*-*-* avr-*-* " } { "*" } { "" } } */
>>>  /* { dg-skip-if "Variadic funcs use Base AAPCS.  Normal funcs use VFP variant." { "arm*-*-*" } { "-mfloat-abi=hard" } { "" } } */
>>> +/* { dg-skip-if "Variadic funcs use Base AAPCS.  Normal funcs use VFP variant." { "arm*-*-gnueabihf" } { "*" } { "-mfloat-abi=soft*" } } */
>>>
>>
>>
>> As you've noticed, basing the test's behaviour on the config variant
>> doesn't work reliably.  The builtin-apply2 test really should be skipped
>> if the current test variant is not soft-float.  We already have
>> check_effective_target_arm_hf_eabi in target-supports.exp that checks
>> whether __ARM_PCS_VFP is defined during a compilation.  So can  replace
>> both arm related lines in builtin-apply2 with
>>
>>  /* { dg-skip-if "Variadic funcs use Base AAPCS.  Normal funcs use VFP
>> variant." { "arm*-*-*" && arm_hf_eabi} { "*" } { "" } } */
>>
>>>  /* PR target/12503 */
>>>  /* Origin: <pierre.nguyen-tuong@asim.lip6.fr> */
>>> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c        (revision 201726)
>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tls/pr42894.c        (working copy)
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>>>  /* PR target/42894 */
>>>  /* { dg-do compile } */
>>>  /* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb" { target arm*-*-* } } */
>>> +/* { dg-options "-march=armv5te -mthumb -mfloat-abi=soft" { target arm*-*-*hf } } */
>>>  /* { dg-require-effective-target tls } */
>>>
>>
>> Although the original PR was for Thumb1, this is a generic test.  I'm
>> not convinced that on ARM it should try to force thumb1.  Removing the
>> original dg-options line should solve the problem and we then get better
>> multi-lib testing as well.
>>
>>>  extern __thread int t;
>>> Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c  (revision 201726)
>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/thumb-ltu.c  (working copy)
>>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>>  /* { dg-do compile } */
>>>  /* { dg-skip-if "incompatible options" { arm*-*-* } { "-march=*" } { "-march=armv6" "-march=armv6j" "-march=armv6z" } } */
>>> -/* { dg-options "-mcpu=arm1136jf-s -mthumb -O2" } */
>>> +/* { dg-options "-mcpu=arm1136jf-s -mthumb -O2 -mfloat-abi=soft" } */
>>>
>>
>> This won't work if there's an explict -mfloat-abi={softfp,hard} on the
>> multilib options.  Probably the best thing to do here is to skip the
>> test if arm_thumb1_ok is not true.
>>
>>>  void f(unsigned a, unsigned b, unsigned c, unsigned d)
>>>  {
>>> Index: gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp     (revision 201726)
>>> +++ gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp     (working copy)
>>> @@ -2445,6 +2445,11 @@
>>>       # Must generate floating-point instructions.
>>>       return 0
>>>      }
>>> +    if [check-flags [list "" { *-*-gnueabihf } { "*" } { "" } ]] {
>>> +        # Use existing float-abi and force an fpu which supports fp16
>>
>> This should use arm_hf_eabi as described above.
>>
>>> +     set et_arm_fp16_flags "-mfpu=vfpv4"
>>> +     return 1;
>>> +    }
>>>      if [check-flags [list "" { *-*-* } { "-mfpu=*" } { "" } ]] {
>>>          # The existing -mfpu value is OK; use it, but add softfp.
>>>       set et_arm_fp16_flags "-mfloat-abi=softfp"
>>>
>>
>> Kyrill's comments re ChangeLogs also apply.
>>
>> R.
>>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list