[PATCH] Improve handling of threads which cross over the current loops header
Jeff Law
law@redhat.com
Wed Nov 27 17:48:00 GMT 2013
On 11/27/13 04:28, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> Ick ;) Loop fixup isn't able to recover the original loop here, it
> discovers a "new" one, the one just covering looping through the
> default: case of the switch.
I wouldn't expect it to. I don't have the transformed CFG in front of
me right now, but as you probably saw, it's scrambled pretty badly.
Sadly, we found out yesterday that the submitter of that BZ reduced
coremark too far and the transformation doesn't actually apply to
coremark. We're not going to try and extend things at this point in
the game -- that'll have to be 4.10/5.0 material.
jeff
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list