wide-int, aarch64

Kenneth Zadeck zadeck@naturalbridge.com
Sun Nov 24 13:30:00 GMT 2013


On 11/23/2013 04:36 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Richi has asked the we break the wide-int patch so that the individual port and front end maintainers can review their parts without have to go through the entire patch.    This patch covers the aarch64 port.
>
> +  wide_int w = real_to_integer (&m, &fail, HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT * 2);
>
> Should we have a gcc_assert (!fail); after the real_to_integer?  Other
> than that this seems obvious.
It actually is not obvious.   In general we did not add checking where 
there was none before.   the fact that this interface allows the 
checking the trunk interface did not does not mean that we are obligated 
to do that.
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
>> Ok?
>>



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list