[PATCH][1/3] Re-submission of Altera Nios II port, gcc parts
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Thu Nov 21 10:19:00 GMT 2013
On 11/21/2013 02:41 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> I'm not saying we tolerate "wrong" RTL form, but rather that, it should
> be an issue of the RTL passes, not the backend. The backend should just
> be as much as possible, a "machine description".
Matching non-canonical rtl does nothing but slow down the compiler and cause
confusion for the poor person that has to maintain the code later.
I'm with Richard S on this one.
r~
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list