[PATCH i386] Enable -freorder-blocks-and-partition

[Jan Hubicka]

Martin,
can you, please, generate the updated systemtap with
-freorder-blocks-and-partition enabled?

I am in favour of enabling this - it is usefull pass and it is pointless ot
have passes that are not enabled by default.
Is there reason why this would not work on other ELF target? Is it working
with Darwin and Windows?

> This patch enables -freorder-blocks-and-partition by default for x86
> at -O2 and up. It is showing some modest gains in cpu2006 performance
> with profile feedback and -O2 on an Intel Westmere system. Specifically,
> I am seeing consistent improvements in 401.bzip2 (1.5-3%), 483.xalancbmk
> (1.5-3%), and 453.povray (2.5-3%), and no apparent regressions.

This actually sounds very good ;)

Lets see how the systemtap graphs goes.  If we will end up with problem
of too many accesses to cold section, I would suggest making cold section
subdivided into .unlikely and .unlikely.part (we could have better name)
with the second consisting only of unlikely parts of hot&normal functions.

This should reduce the problems we are seeing with mistakely identifying
code to be cold because of roundoff errors (and it probably makes sense
in general, too).
We will however need to update gold and ld for that.
> 
> Bootstrapped and tested on x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu with a normal
> bootstrap, a profiledbootstrap and an LTO profiledbootstrap. All were
> configured with --enable-languages=all,obj-c++ and tested for both
> 32 and 64-bit with RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\}".
> 
> It would be good to enable this for additional targets as a follow on,
> but it needs more testing for both correctness and performance on those
> other targets (i.e for correctness because I see a number of places
> in other config/*/*.c files that do some special handling under this
> option for different targets or simply disable it, so I am not sure
> how well-tested it is under different architectural constraints).
> 
> Ok for trunk?
> 
> Thanks,
> Teresa
> 
> 2013-11-19  Teresa Johnson  <tejohnson@google.com>
> 
>         * common/config/i386/i386-common.c: Enable
>         -freorder-blocks-and-partition at -O2 and up for x86.
>         * opts.c (finish_options): Only warn if -freorder-blocks-and-
>         partition was set on command line.

You probably mis doc/invoke.texi update.
Thank you for working on this!

Honza
> 
> Index: common/config/i386/i386-common.c
> ===================================================================
> --- common/config/i386/i386-common.c    (revision 205001)
> +++ common/config/i386/i386-common.c    (working copy)
> @@ -789,6 +789,8 @@ static const struct default_options ix86_option_op
>    {
>      /* Enable redundant extension instructions removal at -O2 and higher.  */
>      { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_free, NULL, 1 },
> +    /* Enable function splitting at -O2 and higher.  */
> +    { OPT_LEVELS_2_PLUS, OPT_freorder_blocks_and_partition, NULL, 1 },
>      /* Turn off -fschedule-insns by default.  It tends to make the
>         problem with not enough registers even worse.  */
>      { OPT_LEVELS_ALL, OPT_fschedule_insns, NULL, 0 },
> Index: opts.c
> ===================================================================
> --- opts.c      (revision 205001)
> +++ opts.c      (working copy)
> @@ -737,9 +737,10 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct g
>        && opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition
>        && (ui_except == UI_SJLJ || ui_except >= UI_TARGET))
>      {
> -      inform (loc,
> -             "-freorder-blocks-and-partition does not work "
> -             "with exceptions on this architecture");
> +      if (opts_set->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition)
> +        inform (loc,
> +                "-freorder-blocks-and-partition does not work "
> +                "with exceptions on this architecture");
>        opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition = 0;
>        opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks = 1;
>      }
> @@ -752,9 +753,10 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct g
>        && opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition
>        && (ui_except == UI_SJLJ || ui_except >= UI_TARGET))
>      {
> -      inform (loc,
> -             "-freorder-blocks-and-partition does not support "
> -             "unwind info on this architecture");
> +      if (opts_set->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition)
> +        inform (loc,
> +                "-freorder-blocks-and-partition does not support "
> +                "unwind info on this architecture");
>        opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition = 0;
>        opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks = 1;
>      }
> @@ -769,9 +771,10 @@ finish_options (struct gcc_options *opts, struct g
>               && targetm_common.unwind_tables_default
>               && (ui_except == UI_SJLJ || ui_except >= UI_TARGET))))
>      {
> -      inform (loc,
> -             "-freorder-blocks-and-partition does not work "
> -             "on this architecture");
> +      if (opts_set->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition)
> +        inform (loc,
> +                "-freorder-blocks-and-partition does not work "
> +                "on this architecture");
>        opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks_and_partition = 0;
>        opts->x_flag_reorder_blocks = 1;
>      }
> 
> 
> -- 
> Teresa Johnson | Software Engineer | tejohnson@google.com | 408-460-2413