[PATCH] make has_gate and has_execute useless
Richard Biener
richard.guenther@gmail.com
Fri Nov 15 13:26:00 GMT 2013
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Trevor Saunders <tsaunders@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 12:54:05PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Trevor Saunders <tsaunders@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:58:36PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Trevor Saunders <tsaunders@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:37:00AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> >> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:00 PM, <tsaunders@mozilla.com> wrote:
>> >> >> > From: Trevor Saunders <tsaunders@mozilla.com>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This is the result of seeing what it would take to get rid of the has_gate and
>> >> >> > has_execute flags on pass_data. It turns out not much, but I wanted
>> >> >> > confirmation this part is ok before I go deal with all the places that
>> >> >> > initialize the fields.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I bootstrapped this part on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and saw no new test suite
>> >> >> > regressions (ignoring the silk stuff because the full paths in its test names
>> >> >> > break my test script for now) Any reason this patch with the actual removal of the flags wouldn't be ok?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The has_gate flag is easy to remove (without a TODO_ hack), right?
>> >> >> No gate simply means that the gate returns always true. The only
>> >> >> weird thing is
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /* If we have a gate, combine the properties that we could have with
>> >> >> and without the pass being examined. */
>> >> >> if (pass->has_gate)
>> >> >> properties &= new_properties;
>> >> >> else
>> >> >> properties = new_properties;
>> >> >>
>> >> >> which I don't understand (and you just removed all properties handling there).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> So can you split out removing has_gate? This part is obviously ok.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Then, for ->execute () I'd have refactored the code to make
>> >> >> ->sub passes explicitely executed by the default ->execute ()
>> >> >> implementation only. That is, passes without overriding execute
>> >> >> are containers only. Can you quickly check whether that would
>> >> >> work out?
>> >> >
>> >> > Ok, I've now given this a shot and wasn't terribly successful, if I just
>> >> > change execute_pass_list and execute_ipa_pass_list to handle container
>> >> > passes executing their sub passes I get the following ICE
>> >> >
>> >> > ./gt-passes.h:77:2: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>> >> > };
>> >> > ^
>> >> > 0xd43d96 crash_signal
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/toplev.c:334
>> >> > 0xd901a9 ssa_default_def(function*, tree_node*)
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/tree-dfa.c:318
>> >> > 0xb56d77 ipa_analyze_params_uses
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/ipa-prop.c:2094
>> >> > 0xb57275 ipa_analyze_node(cgraph_node*)
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/ipa-prop.c:2179
>> >> > 0x13e2b6d ipcp_generate_summary
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/ipa-cp.c:3615
>> >> > 0xc55a2a
>> >> > execute_ipa_summary_passes(ipa_opt_pass_d*)
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/passes.c:1991
>> >> > 0x943341 ipa_passes
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2011
>> >> > 0x943675
>> >> > compile()
>> >> > /src/gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2118
>> >> >
>> >> > now
>> >> > Which is because fn->gimple_df is null. I expect that's because pass
>> >> > ordering changed somehow, but I'm not sure off hand how or ifthat's
>> >> > something worth figuring out right now.
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, some of the walking doesn't seem to work ... probably a
>> >> pass with sub-passes already has an execute member function ;)
>> >
>> > Sounds like a reasonable guess.
>> >
>> >> > Another issue I realized is that doing this will change the order of
>> >> > plugin events from
>> >> > start container pass a
>> >> > end container pass a
>> >> > start contained pass b
>> >> > end contained pass b
>> >> > ...
>> >> >
>> >> > to
>> >> >
>> >> > start container pass a
>> >> > start contained pass b
>> >> > end contained pass b
>> >> > end container pass a
>> >> >
>> >> > Arguably that's an improvement, but I'm not sure if changing that APi
>> >> > like that is acceptable.
>> >>
>> >> Indeed an improvement. Can you attach your patch?
>> >
>> > ok, done
>>
>> It's pass_early_local_passes which has sub-passes and adjusts
>> cgraph state in its execute.
>>
>> The following works for me (not really tested of course).
>
> ok, thanks a lot for looking, I'll test with the removal of the flags
> and repost the full patch.
There seem to be similar issues elsewhere (from just running
tree-ssa.exp).
Richard.
> Trev
>
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > Trev
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Richard.
>> >>
>> >> > Trev
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Richard.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Trev
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 2013-11-06 Trevor Saunders <tsaunders@mozilla.com>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > * pass_manager.h (pass_manager): Adjust.
>> >> >> > * passes.c (opt_pass::execute): Tell the pass manager it doesn't need
>> >> >> > to do anything for this pass.
>> >> >> > (pass_manager::register_dump_files_1): Don't uselessly deal with
>> >> >> > properties of passes.
>> >> >> > (pass_manager::register_dump_files): Adjust.
>> >> >> > (dump_one_pass): Just call pass->gate ().
>> >> >> > (execute_ipa_summary_passes): Likewise.
>> >> >> > (execute_one_pass): Don't check pass->has_execute flag.
>> >> >> > (ipa_write_summaries_2): Don't check pass->has_gate flag.
>> >> >> > (ipa_write_optimization_summaries_1): Likewise.
>> >> >> > (ipa_read_summaries_1): Likewise.
>> >> >> > (ipa_read_optimization_summaries_1): Likewise.
>> >> >> > (execute_ipa_stmt_fixups): Likewise.
>> >> >> > * tree-pass.h (pass_data): Rename has_gate to useless_has_gate and
>> >> >> > has_execute to useless_has_execute to be sure they're unused.
>> >> >> > (TODO_absolutely_nothing): New constant.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > diff --git a/gcc/pass_manager.h b/gcc/pass_manager.h
>> >> >> > index 77d78eb..3bc0a99 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/gcc/pass_manager.h
>> >> >> > +++ b/gcc/pass_manager.h
>> >> >> > @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ public:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > private:
>> >> >> > void set_pass_for_id (int id, opt_pass *pass);
>> >> >> > - int register_dump_files_1 (struct opt_pass *pass, int properties);
>> >> >> > + void register_dump_files_1 (struct opt_pass *pass);
>> >> >> > void register_dump_files (struct opt_pass *pass, int properties);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > private:
>> >> >> > diff --git a/gcc/passes.c b/gcc/passes.c
>> >> >> > index 19e5869..3b28dc9 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/gcc/passes.c
>> >> >> > +++ b/gcc/passes.c
>> >> >> > @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ opt_pass::gate ()
>> >> >> > unsigned int
>> >> >> > opt_pass::execute ()
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > - return 0;
>> >> >> > + return TODO_absolutely_nothing;
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > opt_pass::opt_pass (const pass_data &data, context *ctxt)
>> >> >> > @@ -701,33 +701,21 @@ pass_manager::register_one_dump_file (struct opt_pass *pass)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Recursive worker function for register_dump_files. */
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -int
>> >> >> > +void
>> >> >> > pass_manager::
>> >> >> > -register_dump_files_1 (struct opt_pass *pass, int properties)
>> >> >> > +register_dump_files_1 (struct opt_pass *pass)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > do
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > - int new_properties = (properties | pass->properties_provided)
>> >> >> > - & ~pass->properties_destroyed;
>> >> >> > -
>> >> >> > if (pass->name && pass->name[0] != '*')
>> >> >> > register_one_dump_file (pass);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > if (pass->sub)
>> >> >> > - new_properties = register_dump_files_1 (pass->sub, new_properties);
>> >> >> > -
>> >> >> > - /* If we have a gate, combine the properties that we could have with
>> >> >> > - and without the pass being examined. */
>> >> >> > - if (pass->has_gate)
>> >> >> > - properties &= new_properties;
>> >> >> > - else
>> >> >> > - properties = new_properties;
>> >> >> > + register_dump_files_1 (pass->sub);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > pass = pass->next;
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> > while (pass);
>> >> >> > -
>> >> >> > - return properties;
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Register the dump files for the pass_manager starting at PASS.
>> >> >> > @@ -739,7 +727,7 @@ pass_manager::
>> >> >> > register_dump_files (struct opt_pass *pass,int properties)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > pass->properties_required |= properties;
>> >> >> > - register_dump_files_1 (pass, properties);
>> >> >> > + register_dump_files_1 (pass);
>> >> >> > }
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > struct pass_registry
>> >> >> > @@ -847,7 +835,7 @@ dump_one_pass (struct opt_pass *pass, int pass_indent)
>> >> >> > const char *pn;
>> >> >> > bool is_on, is_really_on;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > - is_on = pass->has_gate ? pass->gate () : true;
>> >> >> > + is_on = pass->gate ();
>> >> >> > is_really_on = override_gate_status (pass, current_function_decl, is_on);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > if (pass->static_pass_number <= 0)
>> >> >> > @@ -2002,7 +1990,7 @@ execute_ipa_summary_passes (struct ipa_opt_pass_d *ipa_pass)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Execute all of the IPA_PASSes in the list. */
>> >> >> > if (ipa_pass->type == IPA_PASS
>> >> >> > - && ((!pass->has_gate) || pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > + && pass->gate ()
>> >> >> > && ipa_pass->generate_summary)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > pass_init_dump_file (pass);
>> >> >> > @@ -2153,7 +2141,7 @@ execute_one_pass (struct opt_pass *pass)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Check whether gate check should be avoided.
>> >> >> > User controls the value of the gate through the parameter "gate_status". */
>> >> >> > - gate_status = pass->has_gate ? pass->gate () : true;
>> >> >> > + gate_status = pass->gate ();
>> >> >> > gate_status = override_gate_status (pass, current_function_decl, gate_status);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Override gate with plugin. */
>> >> >> > @@ -2210,11 +2198,11 @@ execute_one_pass (struct opt_pass *pass)
>> >> >> > timevar_push (pass->tv_id);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Do it! */
>> >> >> > - if (pass->has_execute)
>> >> >> > - {
>> >> >> > - todo_after = pass->execute ();
>> >> >> > - do_per_function (clear_last_verified, NULL);
>> >> >> > - }
>> >> >> > + todo_after = pass->execute ();
>> >> >> > + if (todo_after != TODO_absolutely_nothing)
>> >> >> > + do_per_function (clear_last_verified, NULL);
>> >> >> > + else
>> >> >> > + todo_after &= ~TODO_absolutely_nothing;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* Stop timevar. */
>> >> >> > if (pass->tv_id != TV_NONE)
>> >> >> > @@ -2286,7 +2274,7 @@ ipa_write_summaries_2 (struct opt_pass *pass, struct lto_out_decl_state *state)
>> >> >> > gcc_assert (pass->type == SIMPLE_IPA_PASS || pass->type == IPA_PASS);
>> >> >> > if (pass->type == IPA_PASS
>> >> >> > && ipa_pass->write_summary
>> >> >> > - && ((!pass->has_gate) || pass->gate ()))
>> >> >> > + && pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > /* If a timevar is present, start it. */
>> >> >> > if (pass->tv_id)
>> >> >> > @@ -2402,7 +2390,7 @@ ipa_write_optimization_summaries_1 (struct opt_pass *pass, struct lto_out_decl_s
>> >> >> > gcc_assert (pass->type == SIMPLE_IPA_PASS || pass->type == IPA_PASS);
>> >> >> > if (pass->type == IPA_PASS
>> >> >> > && ipa_pass->write_optimization_summary
>> >> >> > - && ((!pass->has_gate) || pass->gate ()))
>> >> >> > + && pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > /* If a timevar is present, start it. */
>> >> >> > if (pass->tv_id)
>> >> >> > @@ -2479,7 +2467,7 @@ ipa_read_summaries_1 (struct opt_pass *pass)
>> >> >> > gcc_assert (!cfun);
>> >> >> > gcc_assert (pass->type == SIMPLE_IPA_PASS || pass->type == IPA_PASS);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > - if ((!pass->has_gate) || pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > + if (pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > if (pass->type == IPA_PASS && ipa_pass->read_summary)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > @@ -2530,7 +2518,7 @@ ipa_read_optimization_summaries_1 (struct opt_pass *pass)
>> >> >> > gcc_assert (!cfun);
>> >> >> > gcc_assert (pass->type == SIMPLE_IPA_PASS || pass->type == IPA_PASS);
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > - if ((!pass->has_gate) || pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > + if (pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > if (pass->type == IPA_PASS && ipa_pass->read_optimization_summary)
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > @@ -2608,7 +2596,7 @@ execute_ipa_stmt_fixups (struct opt_pass *pass,
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > /* Execute all of the IPA_PASSes in the list. */
>> >> >> > if (pass->type == IPA_PASS
>> >> >> > - && ((!pass->has_gate) || pass->gate ()))
>> >> >> > + && pass->gate ())
>> >> >> > {
>> >> >> > struct ipa_opt_pass_d *ipa_pass = (struct ipa_opt_pass_d *) pass;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > diff --git a/gcc/tree-pass.h b/gcc/tree-pass.h
>> >> >> > index 9efee1e..bed639e 100644
>> >> >> > --- a/gcc/tree-pass.h
>> >> >> > +++ b/gcc/tree-pass.h
>> >> >> > @@ -49,11 +49,11 @@ struct pass_data
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* If true, this pass has its own implementation of the opt_pass::gate
>> >> >> > method. */
>> >> >> > - bool has_gate;
>> >> >> > + bool useless_has_gate;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* If true, this pass has its own implementation of the opt_pass::execute
>> >> >> > method. */
>> >> >> > - bool has_execute;
>> >> >> > + bool useless_has_execute;
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > /* The timevar id associated with this pass. */
>> >> >> > /* ??? Ideally would be dynamically assigned. */
>> >> >> > @@ -299,6 +299,10 @@ protected:
>> >> >> > /* Rebuild the callgraph edges. */
>> >> >> > #define TODO_rebuild_cgraph_edges (1 << 22)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > +/* Should only be used by opt_pass::execute to tell the pass manager the pass
>> >> >> > + did absolutely nothing. */
>> >> >> > +#define TODO_absolutely_nothing 1 << 23
>> >> >> > +
>> >> >> > /* Internally used in execute_function_todo(). */
>> >> >> > #define TODO_update_ssa_any \
>> >> >> > (TODO_update_ssa \
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > 1.8.4.2
>> >> >> >
>
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list