Revert libsanitizer patches or fix 59009

Michael Meissner meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Tue Nov 12 19:25:00 GMT 2013


On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:07:32AM -0800, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Michael Meissner
> <meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:43:38AM -0800, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
> >> or, alternatively, we can disable libsanitizer on PowerPC if the
> >> PowerPC community does not care enough about it being healthy.
> >
> > I think there should be a global --enable-libsanitizer or whatever option that
> > would allow people to enable it.  It should only be default on x86_64 until
> > people are motivated to fix libsantizer on all instances of the platform.
> 
> I don't mind that.
> 
> >
> > --
> > Michael Meissner, IBM
> > IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460, USA
> > email: meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797
> >

In terms of not being able to reproduce it, I just logged onto the powerpc64
machine on the GCC compile farm (gcc110.fsffrance.org), and I was able to
reproduce the bug in about 15 minutes using no special configure options.

Here is information about the compile farm:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm 

-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
IBM, M/S 2506R, 550 King Street, Littleton, MA 01460, USA
email: meissner@linux.vnet.ibm.com, phone: +1 (978) 899-4797



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list