[patch] Create gimple-expr..[ch] ... was Re: RFC: gimple.[ch] break apart
Andrew MacLeod
amacleod@redhat.com
Thu Nov 7 13:47:00 GMT 2013
On 11/07/2013 05:36 AM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 11:26:46AM -0500, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>> I decided to name the new file gimple-expr.[ch] instead of
>> gimple-decl.... This will eventually split into gimple-type.[ch],
>> gimple-decl.[ch], and gimple-expr.[ch].
>
> Since we are adding *new* C++ files, can't we please name them *.cc
> for the implementation part, so at least create gimple-expr.h and
> gimple-expr.cc but not gimple-expr.c, please!
Assuming we put this into stage 1 next year, I would imagine we'd
rename a number of things, including .cc, drop the tree-* from the
tree-ssa-blah.[c]h files, etc etc. There have been a few things people
have suggested renaming... I think if we do renaming, they ought to be
all at one time to minimize the pain.
At the moment, the new gimple-* files I'm creating are still C, so they
are .c files...
Andrew
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list