libsanitizer merge from upstream r191666
H.J. Lu
hjl.tools@gmail.com
Tue Nov 5 06:36:00 GMT 2013
It also breaks x32 build.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Konstantin Serebryany
<konstantin.s.serebryany@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter.
> Does this also mean that asan in llvm trunk is broken for Power?
> We'll need to fix it there too (or, in fact, first).
>
> --kcc
>
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Peter Bergner <bergner@vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-11-04 at 06:47 -0800, Konstantin Serebryany wrote:
>>> This patch has not been tested on Mac and we generally do not claim
>>> that gcc-asan is supported on Mac.
>>> clang-asan *is* supported on Mac and our bots are green (this patch is
>>> a merge of the sources which are regularly tested on Mac,
>>> but the build procedure is different).
>>
>> The merge from upstream r191666 seems to have broken my
>> powerpc64-linux build. I'm seeing:
>>
>> In file included from /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-base/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:21:0:
>> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:31:2: error: ‘ino_t’ does not name a type
>> ino_t st_ino;
>> ^
>> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:33:2: error: ‘nlink_t’ does not name a type
>> nlink_t st_nlink;
>> ^
>> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:34:2: error: ‘mode_t’ does not name a type
>> mode_t st_mode;
>> ^
>> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:39:2: error: ‘uid_t’ does not name a type
>> uid_t st_uid;
>> ^
>> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:40:2: error: ‘gid_t’ does not name a type
>> gid_t st_gid;
>> ^
>> /usr/include/asm/stat.h:42:2: error: ‘off_t’ does not name a type
>> off_t st_size;
>> ^
>> /home/bergner/gcc/gcc-fsf-mainline-base/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cc:29:73: error: invalid application of ‘sizeof’ to incomplete type ‘__sanitizer::__old_kernel_stat’
>> unsigned struct___old_kernel_stat_sz = sizeof(struct __old_kernel_stat);
>> ^
>> The problem seems to be that the RHEL6 system I am on, the linux/types.h
>> kernel header file doesn't define ino_t like it does on newer systems
>> which leads to the undefined type errors. Digging through the other kernel
>> header files, I'm not really seeing another header file I can include
>> to get it either. :(
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
--
H.J.
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list