Fwd: [PATCH] Scheduling result adjustment to enable macro-fusion

[Wei Mi]

Thanks! The three patches are commited as r204367, r204369 and r204371.

Regards,
Wei Mi.

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
>> Ping.  Is it ok for x86 maintainer?
>
> I tought I already approved the x86 bits.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Wei Mi.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Wei Mi <wmi@google.com> wrote:
>> >> Go ahead and consider that pre-approved.  Just send it to the list with a
>> >> note that I approved it in this thread.
>> >>
>> >> Jeff
>> >
>> > Thanks! The new patch addressed Jeff's comments.
>> >
>> > Is it ok for x86 maintainer?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Wei Mi.
>> >
>> > 2013-10-16  Wei Mi  <wmi@google.com>
>> >
>> >         * gcc/config/i386/i386.c (memory_address_length): Extract a part
>> >         of code to rip_relative_addr_p.
>> >         (rip_relative_addr_p): New Function.
>> >         (ix86_macro_fusion_p): Ditto.
>> >         (ix86_macro_fusion_pair_p): Ditto.
>> >         * gcc/config/i386/i386.h: Add new tune features about macro-fusion.
>> >         * gcc/config/i386/x86-tune.def (DEF_TUNE): Ditto.
>> >         * gcc/doc/tm.texi: Generated.
>> >         * gcc/doc/tm.texi.in: Ditto.
>> >         * gcc/haifa-sched.c (try_group_insn): New Function.
>> >         (group_insns_for_macro_fusion): Ditto.
>> >         (sched_init): Call group_insns_for_macro_fusion.
>> >         * gcc/target.def: Add two hooks: macro_fusion_p and
>> >         macro_fusion_pair_p.
>> >
> The i386 bits are OK.
>
> Honza