C++ PATCH: use identifier_p instead of naked TREE_CODE == IDENTIFIER_NODE

Miles Bader miles@gnu.org
Fri Mar 22 04:58:00 GMT 2013

Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net> writes:
> In many places, we do thinks like:
>   1. test that we have a identifier.
>   2. immediately follow that with access to parts of the
>       tree as identifiers, but check again that we really
>       an identifier, etc.
> There is nothing silly about that.

Sure, it's a common and useful pattern.  I'm just saying it's silly to
call it "..._p" in that case...


雨上がり に歩いて、風 柔らかい

More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list