[Committed] S/390: PR57609 fix - use next_active_insn instead of next_real_insn

[Steven Bosscher]

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
> Do you mean that your comment 6 in PR56809 is not a good solution
> since you are going to remove JUMP_TABLE_DAT from active_insn_p ??
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56809

No, that one I'll fix, it's fall-out from the JUMP_TABLE_DATA change
and thus my responsibility to fix.

Ciao!
Steven