[RFC] Implement Undefined Behavior Sanitizer (take 2)

Marek Polacek polacek@redhat.com
Tue Jun 11 20:52:00 GMT 2013


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:44:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> There is another thing to solve BTW, op0 and/or op1 might have side-effects,
> if you are going to evaluate them more than once, they need to be surrounded
> into cp_save_expr resp. c_save_expr.

I see.  Thanks for the notice.

	Marek



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list