[PATCH] fix generic std::atomic<T>::compare_exchange_{weak,strong}
Nathan Froyd
froydnj@mozilla.com
Fri Jul 26 19:02:00 GMT 2013
Sure, I can do that. For maximum effectiveness, it'd be good to have it check the specializations for atomic<>, too. Is there something in the libstdc++ testsuite for iterating template instantiations over a list of types, or do I have to roll the list myself?
Thanks,
-Nathan
----- Original Message -----
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Nathan Froyd <nfroyd@mozilla.com> ha scritto:
> >Compiling the test program:
> >
> >#include <atomic>
> >
> >enum x { a, b };
> >
> >std::atomic<x> v;
> >
> >bool test_strong()
> >{
> > x expected = a;
> >return v.compare_exchange_strong(expected, b,
> >std::memory_order_acq_rel);
> >}
> >
> >bool test_weak()
> >{
> > x expected = a;
> >return v.compare_exchange_weak(expected, b, std::memory_order_acq_rel);
> >}
>
> In any case, why not adding the testcase?
>
> Paolo
>
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list