[PING] Re: C++ 2014 status page for libstdc++

Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd@verizon.net
Wed Jul 3 21:42:00 GMT 2013


On 06/27/2013 11:24 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 07:01 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>> On 26 June 2013 02:28, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
>>> On 06/25/2013 11:59 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>>> On 25 June 2013 16:45, <3dw4rd@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>>> Here is a C++2014 status page for fun and profit.
>>>> Excellent, thanks!
>>>>
>>>>> Tested with xmllint.  Are there any other tests I should do?
>>>> The makefile target to check the docbook manual is:
>>>> make doc-xml-validate-docbook
>>> Checked clean.
>>>
>>>> It should also be linked from doc/xml/manual/intro.xml so it appears
>>>> as part of the manual.
>>> Done.
>>>
>>>> The first paragraph says the table is based on the table of contents
>>>> of the CD, but it isn't.  I agree with only showing the C++14 changes,
>>>> but the first paragraph should be changed (or removed.)
>>>>
>>> Just removed this paragraph.
>>>
>>> Applied.
>> That patch is definitely OK, but please wait for approval before 
>> applying!
> Will do.  Sorry.
>>
>> Thanks again for doing this - I'll try to find time to finish the WIP
>> stuff I'm W'ing on :)
>>
> Cool!
>
> I should have waited because I thought it would be better to have 
> links for the papers.
>
> Also, how does one regenerate html?  Do you do that?
>
> Finally, should we put a line for thins in the 4.9 changes page?
>
>
PING!  Is adding links to the C++2014 library page OK?



More information about the Gcc-patches mailing list