[PR55547] fix alias regression on alpha on misaligned symbols (was: Re: do you have time to review this alpha P1 patch?)
Wed Jan 16 19:35:00 GMT 2013
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Uros Bizjak <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> On 01/15/2013 08:24 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>>> Ok, it's really an alias.c bug, but it is Alpha, and aoliva has already
>>>> provided an unreviewed patch...
>>> The patch in #C4 is ok.
>> Thanks, I'm checking it in (first patch below), but reviewing the logic
>> that uses negative sizes, I found a number of places that should use the
>> absolute value, and others in which being conservative about negative
>> sizes is unnecessary (e.g., when dealing with CONST_INT addresses).
>> That was implemented and regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu. Uros, would
>> you give the second patch a spin on alpha to make sure it doesn't
>> regress? Ok to install it?
> Thanks, I started a bootstrap/regtest run. If everything goes as
> expected, the results will be available in ~10h from now...
The results looks good , no regressions with patch.
More information about the Gcc-patches