[PATCH] Fix up ICE with reduction % (PR tree-optimization/55955)
Jakub Jelinek
jakub@redhat.com
Mon Jan 14 20:49:00 GMT 2013
Hi!
For *SHIFT_EXPR/*ROTATE_EXPR with VECTOR_TYPE types, optab_for_tree_code
requires us to decide if we want optab_vector or optab_scalar. It is likely
not worth it to handle these four, they would fail soon anyway.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
2013-01-14 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/55955
* tree-vect-loop.c (vectorizable_reduction): Give up early on
*SHIFT_EXPR and *ROTATE_EXPR codes.
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55955.c: New test.
--- gcc/tree-vect-loop.c.jj 2013-01-11 09:02:55.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/tree-vect-loop.c 2013-01-14 12:21:29.359018748 +0100
@@ -4776,6 +4776,17 @@ vectorizable_reduction (gimple stmt, gim
{
/* 4. Supportable by target? */
+ if (code == LSHIFT_EXPR || code == RSHIFT_EXPR
+ || code == LROTATE_EXPR || code == RROTATE_EXPR)
+ {
+ /* Shifts and rotates are only supported by vectorizable_shifts,
+ not vectorizable_reduction. */
+ if (dump_enabled_p ())
+ dump_printf_loc (MSG_MISSED_OPTIMIZATION, vect_location,
+ "unsupported shift or rotation.");
+ return false;
+ }
+
/* 4.1. check support for the operation in the loop */
optab = optab_for_tree_code (code, vectype_in, optab_default);
if (!optab)
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55955.c.jj 2013-01-14 12:23:28.273324350 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr55955.c 2013-01-14 12:23:14.000000000 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* PR tree-optimization/55955 */
+
+int b;
+
+void
+foo (int x)
+{
+ int a;
+ for (a = x; a < 2; a++)
+ for (b = 0; b < 2; b++)
+ *(unsigned short *) 0x100000UL %= 46;
+}
Jakub
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list