ping Re: [patch] multiarch backports for the 4.7 and 4.6 branches

[Matthias Klose]

Am 27.11.2012 12:20, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Please find attached backports of the multiarch patches for the active branches.
> 
> The 4.7 patch was tested on a multiarch system (armel, armhf i386, amd64,
> powerpc, powerpc64, sparc, s390, s390x, mips, mipsel), on a non-multiarch system
> (armel, sparc, ia64, powerpc, i386, amd64), with a cross build (armhf, both
> multiarch and non-multiarch), with explicit configure options --enable-multiarch
> and --disable-multiarch.
> 
> The 4.6 patch was tested on a multiarch system (armel, armhf i386, amd64,
> powerpc, powerpc64, sparc, s390, s390x, mips, mipsel), on a non-multiarch system
> (i386, amd64), with a cross build (armhf, both multiarch and non-multiarch),
> with explicit configure options --enable-multiarch and --disable-multiarch.
> 
> If no new issues are found on the trunk, then I would like to put this on the
> branches at the end of next week, if possible.
> 
> Thanks for considering the backports

ping on the backports, attaching two new versions which do include the
powerpcspe and kfreebsd fixes from 2012-12-19/20.

  Matthias


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ma-4.6.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 34526 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20130114/419a200d/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ma-4.7.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 34470 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/attachments/20130114/419a200d/attachment-0001.bin>