[v3] correct doxygen parse

[Jonathan Wakely]

On 20 February 2013 02:07, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote:
>
> Fixups for doxygen. Since 2012-11-20, most of C++11 has been ignored by
> doxygen, resulting in some missing modules documentation even in HTML
> output.
>
> Jakub, this fixes the libstdc++.tag validation errors.
>
> I've regenerated the gcc.gnu.org docs for 4.8.0. They look equivalent or
> better than 4.7.2 to me now.

Parts of the libstdc++ manual are still severely out of date, and
misleading people e.g. the status page (which is probably the most
important part to keep up to date!) refers to monotonic_clock,
http://stackoverflow.com/a/15032749/981959

I fixed that in the status page on February 8th 2012, over a year ago,
but the page hasn't been regenerated since Jan 2012.