[PATCH] Fix handling of very long asm statements in inliner
Fri Feb 22 03:32:00 GMT 2013
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:19:10PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > So I am fine with the cutoff. We may need to add more overflow guards (we
> > already have quite few for time) that makes me wonder if all this should not be
> > done all in saturating arithmetic now when it can be done theoretically with one
> > C++ class?
> Sounds like a good idea, although I don't know how intrusive that is. But can
I looked at this now and it would be very intrusive. Not only in
tree-inline, but also various callers elsewhere. And there's no
saturating class either, so that would need to be added too.
I think I prefer the simple solution.
BTW this is a regression, old gccs compiled this.
More information about the Gcc-patches