libsanitizer merge from upstream r175042
Mon Feb 18 08:40:00 GMT 2013
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Jakub Jelinek <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 07:39:28AM -0800, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:45 PM, Konstantin Serebryany
>> <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > Unfortunately, the test does not work if gold is the system linker.
>> > Any suggestion on how to make the test work with either linker?
>> I don't know of a way to set the address of the text segment for both
>> GNU ld and gold. As you have observed, GNU ld's -Ttext-segment option
>> is the same as gold's -Ttext option. GNU ld's -Ttext option is
>> useless on ELF systems.
>> I will add -Ttext-segment to gold as an alias for -Ttext, but that
>> won't help you today.
> Can't you use then something like:
> // RUN: %clangxx_asan -m64 -DBUILD_SO=1 -fPIC -shared %s -o %t.so -Wl,-Ttext-segment=0x3600000000 || %clangxx_asan -m64 -DBUILD_SO=1 -fPIC -shared %s -o %t.so -Wl,-Ttext=0x3600000000 || exit 0
Yep, that's what I was going to do once Ian confirmed that -Ttext in
gold is equivalent to Ttext-segment bfd ld.
More information about the Gcc-patches