No subject

[Matt]

On Thu, 14 Feb 2013, Xinliang David Li wrote:

> Ok for the google branch -- please provide the patch details in svn
> commit message (note that ChangeLog is not needed any more for the
> branch).

I don't have commit access (yet). Should I email overseers@gcc.gnu.org as 
mentioned at http://gcc.gnu.org/svnwrite.html to get the ball rolling?





> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Matt Hargett <matt@use.net> wrote:
>> On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Matt <matt@use.net> wrote:
>>>> The attached patches do two things:
>>>> 1. Backports a fix from trunk that eliminates bogus warning traces. On my
>>>> current codebase which links ~40MB of C++ with LTO, the bogus warning traces
>>>> are literally hundreds of lines.
>>>
>>> What is the trunk revision?
>>
>> Richard's original patch was committed to trunk in r195884.
>>
>>
>>>> I verified the backport fixed our issue by doing doing a profiledbootstrap
>>>> using the bootstrap-lto.mk config with -O3 added. I used the resulting
>>>> compiler on the proprietary codebase, C++Benchmark, scummvm, and a few other
>>>> open source projects to validate.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Our primary development platform is RHEL6.1-based, and the recent
>>>> autoconf requirement bump locked us out. I lowered the version, and saw no
>>>> difference in ability to configure/bootstrap.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
>>>> http://www.clock.org/~matt
>


--
tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
http://www.clock.org/~matt