No subject

[Matt Hargett]

On Feb 14, 2013, at 10:40 AM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Matt <matt@use.net> wrote:
>> The attached patches do two things:
>> 1. Backports a fix from trunk that eliminates bogus warning traces. On my
>> current codebase which links ~40MB of C++ with LTO, the bogus warning traces
>> are literally hundreds of lines.
> 
> What is the trunk revision?

Richard's original patch was committed to trunk in r195884.


>> I verified the backport fixed our issue by doing doing a profiledbootstrap
>> using the bootstrap-lto.mk config with -O3 added. I used the resulting
>> compiler on the proprietary codebase, C++Benchmark, scummvm, and a few other
>> open source projects to validate.
>> 
>> 2. Our primary development platform is RHEL6.1-based, and the recent
>> autoconf requirement bump locked us out. I lowered the version, and saw no
>> difference in ability to configure/bootstrap.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> tangled strands of DNA explain the way that I behave.
>> http://www.clock.org/~matt