[cxx-conversion] Add Record Builder Class

[Diego Novillo]

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:

> Because it's otherwise almost unused.  No "usual" gimple pass builds
> up record types.  What's the point in introducing the abstraction if
> most of the users cannot use it?

There may be few users on the gimple side, but you are mixing two
orthogonal issues.  Having a similar facility for FEs may be
desirable, but not *this* one.

Perhaps we could have a parent class provide a more generalized set of
services.  Each front end could use it or derive from it for its own
use.  The gimple version could do the same.  Could that work?


Diego.