[cxx-conversion] Add Record Builder Class
Thu Feb 14 11:56:00 GMT 2013
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:26 AM, Richard Biener
> Note that tag_name does not allow the way C++ uses this (it can be
> a TYPE_DECL).
> Overall I'm not sure this is a good abstraction unless you manage to
> make the frontends use it.
I think that is a mistake. This is a pure gimple facility. The fact
that it now looks somewhat similar to what front ends do is a
consequence of the state of the gimple type system.
We very specifically do not want to cater to front ends here. Why do
you think that should be a feature of this interface?
More information about the Gcc-patches