Ping: unreviewed copyright patches
Mon Feb 4 19:08:00 GMT 2013
Ian Lance Taylor <email@example.com> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Richard Sandiford
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Not exactly the most exciting patches, and certainly not worth more than
>> one ping, but:
>> libgcc copyright
> This is OK.
> Don't these count as obvious at this point?
Well, I think the idea behind asking me to send per-directory patches
was so that people could check that I was updating the right things.
OKness for one directory wouldn't really carry over to another.
But I'm glad to say this is the last of the patches anyway.
More information about the Gcc-patches