[C++ Patch] PR 51424

[Jason Merrill]

On 08/30/2013 05:06 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> I should have explained some of that in better detail. The main issue I
> had yesterday, is that the pattern matching can easily become very
> difficult if not impossible: if you look at the second half of
> expand_default_init, in some cases we wrap the returned CALL_EXPR in a
> COND_EXPR

Ah, yes.  Let's go with your first patch, then, rather than make the 
change in multiple places.

Jason