wide-int branch now up for public comment and review

[Florian Weimer]

On 08/13/2013 10:57 PM, Kenneth Zadeck wrote:
> 1) The 4 files that hold the wide-int code itself.  You have seen a
>     lot of this code before except for the infinite precision
>     templates.  Also the classes are more C++ than C in their flavor.
>     In particular, the integration with trees is very tight in that an
>     int-cst or regular integers can be the operands of any wide-int
>     operation.

Are any of these conversions lossy?  Maybe some of these constructors 
should be made explicit?

-- 
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team