[PATCH 4/4] Grammar "it's" to "its".
Adam Butcher
adam@jessamine.co.uk
Sat Aug 3 13:54:00 GMT 2013
On 03.08.2013 14:35, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Adam Butcher <adam@jessamine.co.uk>
> wrote:
>> ---
>> gcc/cp/pt.c | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
>> index a7baaba..99bc71b 100644
>> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
>> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
>> @@ -1986,7 +1986,7 @@ determine_specialization (tree template_id,
>> tree decl_arg_types;
>>
>> /* This is an ordinary member function. However, since
>> - we're here, we can assume it's enclosing class is a
>> + we're here, we can assume its enclosing class is a
>> template class. For example,
>>
>> template <typename T> struct S { void f(); };
>> @@ -4337,7 +4337,7 @@ check_default_tmpl_args (tree decl, tree
>> parms, bool is_primary,
>> || DECL_INITIALIZED_IN_CLASS_P (decl)))
>> /* We already checked these parameters when the template was
>> declared, so there's no need to do it again now. This
>> function
>> - was defined in class scope, but we're processing it's body
>> now
>> + was defined in class scope, but we're processing its body
>> now
>> that the class is complete. */
>> return true;
>>
>> @@ -7482,7 +7482,7 @@ lookup_template_class_1 (tree d1, tree
>> arglist, tree in_decl, tree context,
>> the one of #0.
>>
>> When we encounter #1, we want to store the partial
>> instantiation
>> - of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in it's
>> CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
>> + of M (template<class T> S<int>::M<T>) in its
>> CLASSTYPE_TI_TEMPLATE.
>>
>> For all cases other than this "explicit specialization of
>> member of a
>> class template", we just want to store the most general
>> template into
>> --
>> 1.8.3
>>
>
> OK.
> Do you have copyright assignment on file?
>
Yes. I only came across these as I was addressing one of Jason's
comments for my own bad grammar!
More information about the Gcc-patches
mailing list